Go
back to Charrnet
Next: Construction of Charr farm
Up: The production of Arctic
Previous: The customers
Contents
Index
Subsections
This is the ideal level of production, as it would be just enough to satisfy the demands of the current charr/fish market and allow room for expansion as it increases incrementally each year. An appropriate marketing strategy would ensure that this particular scenario would result in maintaining arctic charr in its current market position as an exclusive upmarket product with a high value price.
On the other hand it is also very plausible that charr farming could go through a rapid expansion, in which case the production will outstrip the demands of the market. This in turn will lead to strong competition, price reductions, poorer quality fish being put on the market, and eventually ending with stationary customer demand and poor market development.
A major step on the road to the ``ideal'' situation would be for the charr producers of each individual country to form a representative body or association, and for each charr association body from each country to meet and openly report with each other, through say FEAP (Federation of European Aquaculture Producers). At a national level the approach would be to try and ensure a common approach among the producers and to ensure the goals of the association are achieved. The goals of these associations would be, primarily, to sell as much charr as possible for as great a price as possible.
Lessons in the mass marketing of farmed fish should be learned from the experience of the salmon industry over the past 15 years. Briefly the history of the salmon industry is that, it underwent a large expansion throughout Europe during the eighties, and it wasn't until 1990 that a price collapse occurred. This price collapse primarily occurred due to production exceeding demand, and the salmon industry lacked having a strong customer based marketing strategy. Up until that point most of the marketing regarding salmon was directed to trade marketing, whereas it could have been aimed at the consumer. A marketing policy focused on customers and based on producers agreement on quality standards, would have helped to, (1) maintain a good image of salmon as a quality high value fish and, (2) help to expand the existing market.
Some developments along these lines have already been established by the Norwegian charr farmers. When charr in Norway was first being marketed it was decided that they would set a price above salmon and on average the charr price has been above salmon even though it's level of production has been increasing steadily. At present the price of charr is approximately 380-500 Icel. Kr. for gutted fish and Icel. Kr. 600-900 for fillets, and in Canada prices are in the $ 4.50 - $5/lb range.
The growing interest among the public in nature protection and sustainable growth, increases the demands on the farmer to establish their codes of best practices for environmental management but it can certainly be an asset when marketing farmed charr. It's natural northern habitat has a positive image as relatively unspoilt and clean. The fact that the fish is grown in cold water is an indication of limited use of energy, not to mention the fact that wild stock is being spared from overfishing.
The key point with all these strategies is the establishment of an international charr producers group, as then the common interest of charr producers can be looked at. Although it is an ambitious plan several other product groups are already established e.g. frozen cod blocks (North Atlantic Seafood Association); trout producers (European Trout Association), and these involve larger numbers of members than would be expected in charr farming.
Iceland already has a brand quality mark produced by the association of Icelandic arctic charr producers, this example should be copied by the other countries which are producing smaller amounts. Indeed the Icelandic and Norwegian producers may have the biggest market share but strong links with producers from other countries can help in selling the product in other countries.
When considering how to increase the charr's market share there is e.g. the method to directly promote this type of fish as a dish, either with a promotional campaign of recipes and suggestions, or by the development of value added products. The charr producers should keep an open mind towards all opportunities but be alert towards threats on the market as well.
Threat two, the bargaining power of buyers, can also be a big potential problem, especially when there is a small yearly tonnage being produced. In some cases just one or two buyers are controlling the whole market. For example in France the large supermarket and hypermarket chains dominate the fresh fish trade and so trying to sell to the French is difficult outside of these major companies. Co-ordination between national and international groups could help to reduce this threat, but this is not to recommend the establishment of a cartel.
Threat three is probably the most dangerous, as rivalry among existing farms at its worst can lead to price competition. Lowering prices is intrinsically a very adverse move as a lower price does not mean that the customers will buy more product at lower prices. In this situation when there is a price war expensive products may loose their premium image, if the price is reduced below a certain level. It may broaden the market but it will definitely reduce product image.
Cutting prices to get a bigger market share is usually quickly copied by rivals, so any advantage is short lived. In a situation where the farmer has an increasing amount of unsold stock and a cash flow problem, the alternative approach to price lowering would be to use volume discounts, whereby a price reduction will occur if the volume bought by a producer increases above a certain level. This way the customer is not getting the same for less money but paying more money for more product.
Due to the small nature of the charr industry threats 4 and 5 are not relevant at this stage, but they may come into play sometime in the future.
Due to the remoteness of a lot of the charr producers farms, air freight may be a more common way of moving the fish from the producer to the markets. In the case of other fish such as salmon chill chains are used. As a result of this, a quid pro quo is established and so the cost of this high level of freshness, is reflected in the price the consumer is expected to pay.
Go
back to Charrnet
Next: Contstruction of Charr farm
Up: The production of Arctic
Previous: The customers
Contents
Index
ragnar/rakel
20 February, 2004